Mordechai Kedar: The World is at War

The third problem Europe will have to find a way to deal with is political correctness that shuts the mouths of anyone pointing to the problem by labeling them racists, extremists and rabble rousers, then placing them in the docks to be castigated by the media, academia, politicians and the public. Political correctness paralyzes any efforts against those who are destroying the foundations of society – it has reached the point where, in Sweden, it is forbidden to connect the rising harassment and rape of women to Muslim immigrants, even though the vast majority of the incidents really are perpetrated by Muslim immigrants – who believe that the wives of infidels are their property.

Arutz Sheva, 20 Nov. 2015

 

Look who’s Germany’s “Commissioner for Immigration, Refugees and Integration”!

From Wikipedia:

Aydan Özoğuz (born 31 May 1967) is a German politician. She is a member of the Bundestag for the Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD) (since 2009), and was elected deputy chairperson of the party in 2011. She currently serves as Minister of State in the German Chancellery and Commissioner for Immigration, Refugees and Integration (since 2013).

[…]

She was born on 31 May 1967 in Finkenau, Hamburg to Turkish parents, who came to Germany in 1958. She grew up in Hamburg-Lokstedt. Her parents went later into their own food business. Aydan Özoğuz acquired the German citizenship in 1989. She has two brothers, Yavuz and Gürhan.

[…]

Özoğuz is on the board of trustees of the “Muslim Academy in Germany” (German: Muslimische Akademie in Deutschland), a foundation in Berlin. Since 2010, she is also deputy member of the board of the trustees of the German Historical Museum and the Foundation for History of Federal Republic of Germany (German: Stiftung Haus der Geschichte der Bundesrepublik Deutschland). Continue reading Look who’s Germany’s “Commissioner for Immigration, Refugees and Integration”!

Daniel Greenfield: “Ein dreifaches Hurra auf Terroristan”

Ein Traum? Ein Alptraum? Wer weiß das schon.

Daniel Greenfield, Sultan Knish, 1. Oktober 2015/Israel National News, 4. Oktober 2015
(übersetzt von Cora)

Wir brauchen einen Terror-Staat. Einen, in dem die Politiker Terroristen sind, die Polizisten Terroristen sind und auch die Menschen, die an dem Tisch sitzen, an dem du dich niederlässt, Terroristen sind.

  Es gibt Staaten, die Terroristen unterstützen und ihnen eine sichere Zuflucht geben. Aber das reicht nicht. Wir wollen kein weiteres Pakistan oder Iran. Diesmal machen wir keine halben Sachen. Was wir wollen ist das echte Produkt. Terroristen von ganz oben bis ganz unten. Terroristen überall. Einen Staat in dem jeder Teil der Regierung und das ganze Land aus nichts anderem als Terroristen besteht.

[→ Weiterlesen bei Heplev]

Israelstreet reports Gaza terrorists have just infiltrated Israel and stolen 6 M16s in Kissufim kibbutz

Israelstreet.org reports:

It was just yesterday that your humble servant went to great lengths to point out how absurdly easy it is for Hamas terrorists from Gaza to stroll across the border at Nahal Oz.

And in the same blog, we pointed out the untenable position that the group of IDF soldiers stationed there are in, undermanned and handcuffed by the absurd IDF rules of engagement.

Well guess what happened following the riots this morning? Apparently (no one knows for sure how many) 30 terrorists waltzed across the border and infiltrated Kissufim. 

They found their way into an armory on the kibbutz and stole 6 M16s–and are now (as of 12 pm) somewhere in the area taking potshots at Israeli men, women, and children.

Obama the peace dove turns out to be more of an (atomic) warmonger

The irony […] is that Obama came to power via the siren call of multilateralism and the glories of the United Nations. And he will leave office having emasculated the Security Council’s potential to promote international peace and security and enforce non-proliferation, destroyed the credibility of the world’s nuclear watchdog agency, and undermined the relevance of treaties for American foreign policy from here on.

Anne Bayefsky, What Obama doesn’t want you (and Congress) to know about his Iran deal, Fox News, September 08, 2015

Martin Sherman on the “debate” on “Jewish terrorism”: “Jewish hate crimes and vandalism are NOT terrorism”

We can and we do [b]urn children alive, execute murderous, inhuman, incomprehensible terror. And no, we’re no better than them…. – Sima Kadmon, “We’re no better than our enemies,” Ynet

They are no different than ISIS… this is Jewish jihadism, identical in every detail to Islamic jihadism –
Ron Ben-Yishai, Ynet

Israelis stab gay people and burn children. There isn’t a shred of slander, the slightest degree of exaggeration, in this dry description – Gideon Levy, Haaretz

 

The events of last week cast doubt on the ability of Israel to survive the merciless brutality that surrounds it.

Deplorable acts by fringe elements 

The insanity – and there is no other word to describe the frenzy that seized the public debate over acts, however heinous, perpetrated by a handful of individuals (some yet unidentified) – [sic; closing dash here, not after “society”, where it should be (I suspect the editor); RR] on the outermost fringe of Israeli society, betrayed a dangerous and dysfunctional disability in the nation’s capacity to order its priorities.

For in what is arguably the most fateful 60-day period in recent decades for the Jewish state, when all the nation’s energies should be focused with laser-like intensity on foiling the perilous Iran nuclear deal before Congress, attention has been diverted by sanctimonious hand-wringing and moralistic self-flagellation over crimes of individual perpetrators on the very margins of society.

[…]

It is an attempt to paint all ideo-political adversaries with the same brush; to taint with the delegitimizing stain of religious fanaticism, all those, who, for a variety of reasoned arguments – security imperatives, historical significance, national heritage, economic pragmatism – oppose p [sic] territorial concession and political appeasement in the conflict with the Palestinian-Arabs.

Source: The Jerusalem Post (online), 6 June 2015

“Who is the perpetrator, who is the victim?” German public TV “reporting” on the anti-Semitic Har Nof massacre – an example of the “balanced” German approach to the “Israeli-Palestinian Conflict”

Blessed be your quality weapons, the wheels of your cars, your axes and kitchen knives. By Allah, these are stronger than the arsenals of our enemy, because [they are being used] according to Allah’s will. We are the soldiers of Allah. – Sultan Abu Al-Einein, Senior Advisor of Mahmoud Abbas and Member of the Fatah Central Committee, one day after the massacre

How beautiful is your Martyrdom. / You have placed a crown [upon my head] / … / O Ghassan and Uday, / who carried out the operation / blessed be your hands and the tips of your fingers. / Blessed be the womb that bore you /… / Yesterday [I gave] the most beautiful gift. / The Martyrs’ blood was not spilled in vain. / I am a Palestinian. – Mother of Uday Abu Jamal

That – in stark contrast to the Jews or even any other people for that matter – the Germans have learned a lot from the Holocaust has long been perfectly clear. So far, they have already played a leading role in preventing a “new Auschwitz” in Kosovo, Serbia, coincidentally defeating in the process once again their (former!) “arch-enemy”, the Serbs, and carving a second Albanian “state”, a Muslim one, out of sovereign Serbian territory, where now, after a series of anti-Serbian, anti-Christian pogroms, if not much else, you can at least make good money if you’re an Albanian Hitler look-alike. In fact, the Germans have learned so much so that in the evening after the horrific slaughter of five people (four Rabbis and a Druze policeman) and the wounding of 10 others in a synagogue in Jerusalem’s Har Nof neighborhood last November, an anchor of the major German public television station ZDF, Marietta Slomka, was able to stay perfectly “neutral” and – as they say in Italian – to “take things with philosophy” without letting even this story remind her and her public of anything.

The following is a commented unabridged translation of the entire introduction by Slomka and of the entire following “report” by a ZDF correspondent in Israel for the news program “Heute Journal”. Continue reading “Who is the perpetrator, who is the victim?” German public TV “reporting” on the anti-Semitic Har Nof massacre – an example of the “balanced” German approach to the “Israeli-Palestinian Conflict”

Links to “Stop Iran Now” Times Square Rally Videos on YouTube (uploaded by JBS)

   Rally To Stop Iran [entire rally]

by JBS

Iran Deal: Remember the last time the entire world seemed to be as trustful as John Kerry is now?

“Unlike North Korea, [the Iranians] have not pulled out of the NPT. Unlike North Korea, they haven’t exploded any nuclear device, and the supreme leader of Iran has said, we’re not going to seek a nuclear weapon.” – John Kerry

The Supreme Leader of Iran already made it clear that the war will continue

until America is destroyed. That may be the only common ground he has with Obama. Both America and Iran are governed by fanatics who believe that America is the source of all evil. Both believe that it needs to be destroyed.

Carter made the Islamic Revolution possible. Obama is enabling its nuclear revolution.

Today Tehran and Washington D.C. are united by a deep distrust of America, distaste for the West and a violent hatred of Israel. This deal is the product of that mutually incomprehensible unity. It is not meant to stop Iran from getting a nuclear bomb. It is meant to stop America and Israel from stopping it.

[…]
The deal assumes that Iran wants lower electricity rates. Iran’s constitution tells us that it wants Jihad. And unlike Obama, Iran’s leaders can be trusted to live up to their Constitution.
Source: Daniel Greenfield, The Myth of Iran’s Peaceful Nuclear Program, 23 July 2015

Live Broadcast from Stop Iran Rally in New York Today (rally begins at 5:30 p.m.)

UPDATE: Coverage of the rally is scheduled to be re-broadcast by Jewish Broadcasting Service (JBS) on:

Thu 7/23
7:00PM-9:00PM

Fri 7/24
1:00AM-3:00AM

Sun 7/26
1:00PM-3:00PM

Continue reading Live Broadcast from Stop Iran Rally in New York Today (rally begins at 5:30 p.m.)

Oops, someone (Israeli UN ambassador Ron Prosor) speaks the truth about what the “P5+1” and the UNSC have just done

Israel’s ambassador to the UN Ron Prosor took on the United Nations Security Council on Monday, just after it unanimously approved a draft resolution implementing the Iranian nuclear deal with the West.

“You have awarded a great prize to the most dangerous country in the world,” Prosor began. “I hate to be the one to spoil the party, but someone has to say the emperor has no clothes.”

Source: Arutz Sheva

Caroline Glick: Obamas Zeitalter des nuklearen Chaos (Einleitung und Übersetzung aus dem Englischen von Robert Rickler)

Weil Caroline Glick zu den wenigen Journalisten gehört, die Klartext reden und keine unterwürfige Selbstzensur betreiben, damit staatliche Zensur überflüssig wird, und somit dem Wort Journalismus seine ursprüngliche Bedeutung und seinen wahren Geist zurückgeben, und weil in den Kolumnen von Caroline Glick ein enormes Fachwissen enthalten ist, welches bedeutend besser ist als das der meisten “Nahost-Experten” sowohl in den Medien als auch an den Universitäten als auch in den politischen Parteien, habe ich zum 25. Mal eine dieser Kolumnen übersetzt.

Das englische Original “Obama’s age of nuclear chaos” findet man hier:

http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Column-One-Obamas-age-of-nuclear-chaos-409272

 

Obamas Zeitalter des nuklearen Chaos

(Autorin: Caroline Glick, übersetzt von Robert Rickler, Pressesprecher des “Freundeskreis Israel in Regensburg und Oberbayern e.V.”)

Am Dienstag (Anmerkung des Übersetzers: Das englische Original stammt vom 16. Juli 2015.) fuhren wir in ein neues Atomzeitalter.

Im alten Atomzeitalter hatte der von den USA angeführte Westen ein System zur Verhinderung der Verbreitung von Kernwaffen. Es hatte drei Komponenten: Sanktionen, Abschreckung und militärische Macht. In den vergangenen Jahren haben wir den erfolgreichen Einsatz aller drei gesehen.

In der Zeit nach dem Golfkrieg von 1991 verhängte der UN-Sicherheitsrat ein hartes Sanktionssystem gegen den Irak. Eines seiner Ziele war, den Irak an der Entwicklung von Atomwaffen zu hindern. Nach der US-geführten Invasion im Irak im Jahr 2003 haben wir gelernt, dass die Sanktionen erfolgreich waren. Saddam hatte sein Atomprogramm durch Sanktionsdruck weitgehend aufgegeben.

Die US-geführte Invasion im Irak erschreckte einige Schurkenstaaten in der Region. In den zwei bis drei Jahren unmittelbar nach der Invasion stieg Amerikas Abschreckungskraft zu ungeahnten Höhen.

Was die Militärmacht angeht, so wurde die kerntechnische Anlage, die der syrische Diktator Baschar al-Assad in Deir a-Zour mit iranischem Geld und nordkoreanischen Technikern gebaut hatte, nicht durch Sanktionen oder Abschreckung zerstört. Laut ausländischen Medienberichten beschloss Israel im September 2007, dass diese Pfade erfolglos wären, um die Verbreitung von Atomwaffen an Syrien zu verhindern.

Also befahl der damalige Ministerpräsident Ehud Olmert der IDF, sie zu zerstören. Der Ausbruch des syrischen Bürgerkriegs drei Jahre später hat Assad und seine iranischen Bosse bis heute daran gehindert, das Programm wiederherzustellen.

[Hier weiterlesen]

Caroline Glick: Das iranisch-amerikanische Nuklearprojekt (Einleitung und Übersetzung von Robert Rickler)

Weil Caroline Glick zu den wenigen Journalisten gehört, die Klartext reden und keine unterwürfige Selbstzensur betreiben, damit staatliche Zensur überflüssig wird, und somit dem Wort Journalismus seine ursprüngliche Bedeutung und seinen wahren Geist zurückgeben, und weil in den Kolumnen von Caroline Glick ein enormes Fachwissen enthalten ist, welches bedeutend besser ist als das der meisten “Nahost-Experten” sowohl in den Medien als auch an den Universitäten als auch in den politischen Parteien, habe ich zum 24. Mal eine dieser Kolumnen übersetzt.

Das englische Original “The Iranian-American nuclear project” findet man hier:
http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Column-one-The-Iranian-American-nuclear-project-407192

 

Das iranisch-amerikanische Nuklearprojekt

(Autorin: Caroline Glick, übersetzt von Robert Rickler, Pressesprecher des “Freundeskreis Israel in Regensburg und Oberbayern e.V.”)
Unter Präsident Barack Obama hat die USA eine Politik gegenüber dem Iran implementiert, die katastrophal ist speziell für Israel, im Allgemeinen für die US-Verbündeten im Nahen Osten und für die nationale Sicherheit der USA selbst.

Betrachten wir zunächst die bekannten Details des bald-zu-beschließenden Nuklearabkommens.
Continue reading Caroline Glick: Das iranisch-amerikanische Nuklearprojekt (Einleitung und Übersetzung von Robert Rickler)