Capito Obama?

La dolorosa verità è che l’obiettivo di Obama non è mai stato quello di impedire che Teheran si procuri l’arma nucleare. Tutta la sua strategia delle “sanzioni-se-il-coinvolgimento-fallisce” non è altro che un espediente. L’amministrazione Obama non ha mai avuto l’intenzione di imporre sanzioni pungenti sull’Iran. Come un autorevole funzionario dell’amministrazione ha detto al New York Times, lo scopo dei discorsi sulle sanzioni è quello di persuadere gli iraniani a negoziare. Nelle sue parole: “Si tratta di riportarli ai negoziati, poiché il vero scopo è quello di evitare la guerra.”

Capito? Per quanto concerne Obama, un Iran con armi atomiche non è la preoccupazione principale. La preoccupazione principale è che Israele potrebbe usare la forza per impedire che Teheran si procuri armi nucleari.*

Difendersi, cioè.

*) Caroline Glick, Sarah Palin’s friendship, JPOST.com, 12/2/2010 (traduzione dall’inglese: Ralph Raschen)

Ecco la spiegazione dell’antisemitismo svedese!

Da qualche giorno, grazie a Caroline Glick e la sua “emittente televisiva” satirica, c’è una spiegazione, anche se per ora, per quanto io sappia, solo per chi sa l’ebraico o l’inglese (e leggere sottotitoli a volte un po’ veloci). La colpa è del latte d’ABBA:

Swedes get their anti-Semitism from their Abba’s milk

From Caroline Glick’s blog (15/09/2009)

Three weeks ago Sweden’s Aftonblodet mass circulation tabloid published a blood libel against Israel in which the IDF was accused of killing Palestinians to harvest their organs. Then last week Norway’s government decided to divest the government pension fund from Israeli defense contractor Elbit because it manufactures electronic sensors used on Israel’s security fence.

They disinvest (don’t buy anything anymore from) an Israeli company that has contributed to save the lives of scores of Jews (and Arabs) by effectively preventing antisemitic terror attacks, while they and all the other European states have continued their anti-Semitic and anti-American monologue with the mullahs of Iran, with Hezbollah and Hamas, for decades now, making big businesses with the former, who are funding and arming the latter (the “former” axis powers Germany and Italy are still the first commercial partners of the Iranian Jihadist state), constituting by this a protective shield for a regime whose first aim is a second mass-murder of Jews on an industrial scale, which declares this openly, and which is working feverishly to achieve that goal.

Seems almost logical, given that the Euros could not get enough already of bombing mercilessly the Serbs, another group of preferred victims of the Nazis (and Muslims) in World War II and before, in the Nineties, and are not worried at all, instead, about a real case of barbaric organ harvesting, perpetrated by their (and the US democrats’) friends and allies, the “ethnic Albanians”, who abducted many Serbs and then extracted and sold their organs, while the pacifist Javier Solana had NATO bomb the rest of them. While the German tabloid “Bild” ran the title “They [the Serbs, “of course”] are driving them [Albanians] into the concentration camp!”, and while those who forced Albanians and Serbs to flee were the members of the Albanian terrorist army KLA, who threatened any Albanian who preferred to stay (with the “dirty Serbs”, with the Gypsies, with the few left Jews); and Solana’s, Fischer’s, Clinton’s, Albright’s, Joe Biden’s NATO bombs.

On Caroline Glick’s website there is also something much more funny (in English) from her satire site Latma:

Seltsam

Infolge der Wahl des eurabischen Kandidaten Barack Hussein Obama zum US-Präsidenten scheint die “Weltvernunft” ihren Wohnsitz in den USA vorübergehend aufgegeben zu haben und nun zwischen Israel und – sie muss es derzeit wirklich schwer haben – sogar Ländern wie Ägypten, Jordanien und Bahrein zu pendeln.

[…] Befürworter ebenso wie Gegner eines israelischen Schlags gegen die Nuklearanlagen des Iran [warnen] davor, dass Irans Aufstellung von Terrorstellvertretern von Beirut bis nach Bolivien, von Managua bis nach Marseilles und von Gaza bis nach Gizeh bedeutet, dass es nach einem israelischen Angriff weltweit sehr hässlich werden könnte.
Doch all die Hässlichkeit, all die Instabilität und all die Tode werden im Vergleich dazu, wie die Region – und tatsächlich die ganze Welt – aussehen werden, wenn Iran eine Nuklearmacht wird, wie ein Spaziergang im Park anmuten. Das ist etwas, das die Araber verstehen. Und das ist der Grund dafür, warum sie Israel unterstützen und für einen israelischen Militärschlag gegen Irans Nuklearanlagen beten.

Caroline Glick, 27.4.2009 (Übersetzung: Ralph Raschen)

“The president speaks”

Die in der “Jerusalem Post” erscheinenden Einschätzungen der Situation Israels von Caroline Glick sind immer zur Lektüre zu empfehlen.

Direkt soll hier wenigstens auf eine hingewiesen werden, die am 14. Juni erschien; eine “Israel- und Amerikakritik”, die nicht gerade Antizionisten und Antisemiten aus der Seele spricht, sondern aufweist, wie weit es der antisemitische Wahn schon wieder gebracht hat.

According to media reports, [US president G.W.] Bush believes that five years after his last speech on the subject on June 24, 2002, the time has come for an updated assessment of the situation. A lot has happened in the last five years both in Israel and in Palestinian society. A good way to understand our present circumstances is to recall that last speech, where Bush laid out his “vision” to bring peace to the Middle East by establishing an independent, democratic Palestinian state next to Israel on the west bank of the Jordan River on land that the League of Nations mandated in 1922 was to be reserved for the Jewish homeland.

Um den ganzen Artikel zu lesen, einfach auf das obige Zitat klicken. Falls es ein anderer sein soll, auf einen anderen der hierunter zitierten Links zu den

LATEST STORIES BY CAROLINE GLICK

 

in der “Jerusalem Post”.

PS: Selbstverständlich sollten und dürften sich auch überzeugte “USA-Kritiker” nicht gerade durch die Analysen Glicks bestätigt fühlen. Denn diese haben nichts mit dem hämischen Auftrumpfen gemein, wie es sich z.B. in der exemplarisch projektiven Suggestivfrage “Totgesiegt?” vor den brennenden Twin Towers auf der ersten “konkret”-Titelseite nach 9/11 äußerte.