Obama the peace dove turns out to be more of an (atomic) warmonger

The irony […] is that Obama came to power via the siren call of multilateralism and the glories of the United Nations. And he will leave office having emasculated the Security Council’s potential to promote international peace and security and enforce non-proliferation, destroyed the credibility of the world’s nuclear watchdog agency, and undermined the relevance of treaties for American foreign policy from here on.

Anne Bayefsky, What Obama doesn’t want you (and Congress) to know about his Iran deal, Fox News, September 08, 2015

Martin Sherman on the “debate” on “Jewish terrorism”: “Jewish hate crimes and vandalism are NOT terrorism”

We can and we do [b]urn children alive, execute murderous, inhuman, incomprehensible terror. And no, we’re no better than them…. – Sima Kadmon, “We’re no better than our enemies,” Ynet

They are no different than ISIS… this is Jewish jihadism, identical in every detail to Islamic jihadism –
Ron Ben-Yishai, Ynet

Israelis stab gay people and burn children. There isn’t a shred of slander, the slightest degree of exaggeration, in this dry description – Gideon Levy, Haaretz

 

The events of last week cast doubt on the ability of Israel to survive the merciless brutality that surrounds it.

Deplorable acts by fringe elements 

The insanity – and there is no other word to describe the frenzy that seized the public debate over acts, however heinous, perpetrated by a handful of individuals (some yet unidentified) – [sic; closing dash here, not after “society”, where it should be (I suspect the editor); RR] on the outermost fringe of Israeli society, betrayed a dangerous and dysfunctional disability in the nation’s capacity to order its priorities.

For in what is arguably the most fateful 60-day period in recent decades for the Jewish state, when all the nation’s energies should be focused with laser-like intensity on foiling the perilous Iran nuclear deal before Congress, attention has been diverted by sanctimonious hand-wringing and moralistic self-flagellation over crimes of individual perpetrators on the very margins of society.

[…]

It is an attempt to paint all ideo-political adversaries with the same brush; to taint with the delegitimizing stain of religious fanaticism, all those, who, for a variety of reasoned arguments – security imperatives, historical significance, national heritage, economic pragmatism – oppose p [sic] territorial concession and political appeasement in the conflict with the Palestinian-Arabs.

Source: The Jerusalem Post (online), 6 June 2015

“Who is the perpetrator, who is the victim?” German public TV “reporting” on the anti-Semitic Har Nof massacre – an example of the “balanced” German approach to the “Israeli-Palestinian Conflict”

Blessed be your quality weapons, the wheels of your cars, your axes and kitchen knives. By Allah, these are stronger than the arsenals of our enemy, because [they are being used] according to Allah’s will. We are the soldiers of Allah. – Sultan Abu Al-Einein, Senior Advisor of Mahmoud Abbas and Member of the Fatah Central Committee, one day after the massacre

How beautiful is your Martyrdom. / You have placed a crown [upon my head] / … / O Ghassan and Uday, / who carried out the operation / blessed be your hands and the tips of your fingers. / Blessed be the womb that bore you /… / Yesterday [I gave] the most beautiful gift. / The Martyrs’ blood was not spilled in vain. / I am a Palestinian. – Mother of Uday Abu Jamal

That – in stark contrast to the Jews or even any other people for that matter – the Germans have learned a lot from the Holocaust has long been perfectly clear. So far, they have already played a leading role in preventing a “new Auschwitz” in Kosovo, Serbia, coincidentally defeating in the process once again their (former!) “arch-enemy”, the Serbs, and carving a second Albanian “state”, a Muslim one, out of sovereign Serbian territory, where now, after a series of anti-Serbian, anti-Christian pogroms, if not much else, you can at least make good money if you’re an Albanian Hitler look-alike. In fact, the Germans have learned so much so that in the evening after the horrific slaughter of five people (four Rabbis and a Druze policeman) and the wounding of 10 others in a synagogue in Jerusalem’s Har Nof neighborhood last November, an anchor of the major German public television station ZDF, Marietta Slomka, was able to stay perfectly “neutral” and – as they say in Italian – to “take things with philosophy” without letting even this story remind her and her public of anything.

The following is a commented unabridged translation of the entire introduction by Slomka and of the entire following “report” by a ZDF correspondent in Israel for the news program “Heute Journal”. Continue reading “Who is the perpetrator, who is the victim?” German public TV “reporting” on the anti-Semitic Har Nof massacre – an example of the “balanced” German approach to the “Israeli-Palestinian Conflict”

Links to “Stop Iran Now” Times Square Rally Videos on YouTube (uploaded by JBS)

   Rally To Stop Iran [entire rally]

by JBS

Iran Deal: Remember the last time the entire world seemed to be as trustful as John Kerry is now?

“Unlike North Korea, [the Iranians] have not pulled out of the NPT. Unlike North Korea, they haven’t exploded any nuclear device, and the supreme leader of Iran has said, we’re not going to seek a nuclear weapon.” – John Kerry

The Supreme Leader of Iran already made it clear that the war will continue

until America is destroyed. That may be the only common ground he has with Obama. Both America and Iran are governed by fanatics who believe that America is the source of all evil. Both believe that it needs to be destroyed.

Carter made the Islamic Revolution possible. Obama is enabling its nuclear revolution.

Today Tehran and Washington D.C. are united by a deep distrust of America, distaste for the West and a violent hatred of Israel. This deal is the product of that mutually incomprehensible unity. It is not meant to stop Iran from getting a nuclear bomb. It is meant to stop America and Israel from stopping it.

[…]
The deal assumes that Iran wants lower electricity rates. Iran’s constitution tells us that it wants Jihad. And unlike Obama, Iran’s leaders can be trusted to live up to their Constitution.
Source: Daniel Greenfield, The Myth of Iran’s Peaceful Nuclear Program, 23 July 2015

Live Broadcast from Stop Iran Rally in New York Today (rally begins at 5:30 p.m.)

UPDATE: Coverage of the rally is scheduled to be re-broadcast by Jewish Broadcasting Service (JBS) on:

Thu 7/23
7:00PM-9:00PM

Fri 7/24
1:00AM-3:00AM

Sun 7/26
1:00PM-3:00PM

Continue reading Live Broadcast from Stop Iran Rally in New York Today (rally begins at 5:30 p.m.)

Oops, someone (Israeli UN ambassador Ron Prosor) speaks the truth about what the “P5+1” and the UNSC have just done

Israel’s ambassador to the UN Ron Prosor took on the United Nations Security Council on Monday, just after it unanimously approved a draft resolution implementing the Iranian nuclear deal with the West.

“You have awarded a great prize to the most dangerous country in the world,” Prosor began. “I hate to be the one to spoil the party, but someone has to say the emperor has no clothes.”

Source: Arutz Sheva

Caroline Glick: Obamas Zeitalter des nuklearen Chaos (Einleitung und Übersetzung aus dem Englischen von Robert Rickler)

Weil Caroline Glick zu den wenigen Journalisten gehört, die Klartext reden und keine unterwürfige Selbstzensur betreiben, damit staatliche Zensur überflüssig wird, und somit dem Wort Journalismus seine ursprüngliche Bedeutung und seinen wahren Geist zurückgeben, und weil in den Kolumnen von Caroline Glick ein enormes Fachwissen enthalten ist, welches bedeutend besser ist als das der meisten “Nahost-Experten” sowohl in den Medien als auch an den Universitäten als auch in den politischen Parteien, habe ich zum 25. Mal eine dieser Kolumnen übersetzt.

Das englische Original “Obama’s age of nuclear chaos” findet man hier:

http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Column-One-Obamas-age-of-nuclear-chaos-409272

 

Obamas Zeitalter des nuklearen Chaos

(Autorin: Caroline Glick, übersetzt von Robert Rickler, Pressesprecher des “Freundeskreis Israel in Regensburg und Oberbayern e.V.”)

Am Dienstag (Anmerkung des Übersetzers: Das englische Original stammt vom 16. Juli 2015.) fuhren wir in ein neues Atomzeitalter.

Im alten Atomzeitalter hatte der von den USA angeführte Westen ein System zur Verhinderung der Verbreitung von Kernwaffen. Es hatte drei Komponenten: Sanktionen, Abschreckung und militärische Macht. In den vergangenen Jahren haben wir den erfolgreichen Einsatz aller drei gesehen.

In der Zeit nach dem Golfkrieg von 1991 verhängte der UN-Sicherheitsrat ein hartes Sanktionssystem gegen den Irak. Eines seiner Ziele war, den Irak an der Entwicklung von Atomwaffen zu hindern. Nach der US-geführten Invasion im Irak im Jahr 2003 haben wir gelernt, dass die Sanktionen erfolgreich waren. Saddam hatte sein Atomprogramm durch Sanktionsdruck weitgehend aufgegeben.

Die US-geführte Invasion im Irak erschreckte einige Schurkenstaaten in der Region. In den zwei bis drei Jahren unmittelbar nach der Invasion stieg Amerikas Abschreckungskraft zu ungeahnten Höhen.

Was die Militärmacht angeht, so wurde die kerntechnische Anlage, die der syrische Diktator Baschar al-Assad in Deir a-Zour mit iranischem Geld und nordkoreanischen Technikern gebaut hatte, nicht durch Sanktionen oder Abschreckung zerstört. Laut ausländischen Medienberichten beschloss Israel im September 2007, dass diese Pfade erfolglos wären, um die Verbreitung von Atomwaffen an Syrien zu verhindern.

Also befahl der damalige Ministerpräsident Ehud Olmert der IDF, sie zu zerstören. Der Ausbruch des syrischen Bürgerkriegs drei Jahre später hat Assad und seine iranischen Bosse bis heute daran gehindert, das Programm wiederherzustellen.

[Hier weiterlesen]

Caroline Glick: Das iranisch-amerikanische Nuklearprojekt (Einleitung und Übersetzung von Robert Rickler)

Weil Caroline Glick zu den wenigen Journalisten gehört, die Klartext reden und keine unterwürfige Selbstzensur betreiben, damit staatliche Zensur überflüssig wird, und somit dem Wort Journalismus seine ursprüngliche Bedeutung und seinen wahren Geist zurückgeben, und weil in den Kolumnen von Caroline Glick ein enormes Fachwissen enthalten ist, welches bedeutend besser ist als das der meisten “Nahost-Experten” sowohl in den Medien als auch an den Universitäten als auch in den politischen Parteien, habe ich zum 24. Mal eine dieser Kolumnen übersetzt.

Das englische Original “The Iranian-American nuclear project” findet man hier:
http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Column-one-The-Iranian-American-nuclear-project-407192

 

Das iranisch-amerikanische Nuklearprojekt

(Autorin: Caroline Glick, übersetzt von Robert Rickler, Pressesprecher des “Freundeskreis Israel in Regensburg und Oberbayern e.V.”)
Unter Präsident Barack Obama hat die USA eine Politik gegenüber dem Iran implementiert, die katastrophal ist speziell für Israel, im Allgemeinen für die US-Verbündeten im Nahen Osten und für die nationale Sicherheit der USA selbst.

Betrachten wir zunächst die bekannten Details des bald-zu-beschließenden Nuklearabkommens.
Continue reading Caroline Glick: Das iranisch-amerikanische Nuklearprojekt (Einleitung und Übersetzung von Robert Rickler)

Some utterances of EU “foreign policy chief” Federica Mogherini in connection with Israel and/or of some import for it (and the entire free world)

“From Lebanese territory toward Israel are departing demonstrative rockets which are produced on a small scale and which are not being launched in order to really hit, but only in order to signal the living resistance/existence [(r)esistenza in vita] […].” (2009)

The world is my constituency.” (2013)

“We need a Palestinian state […].” (2014)

“I think Jerusalem can be and should be the capital of two states.” (2014)

“The message is not for the people who live here, the message is to the rest of the world. It is not a Palestinian-Israeli situation, it is a global issue.” (2014)

“The E3/EU+3 and the Islamic Republic of Iran welcome this [h]istoric joint comprehensive plan of action which will ensure that Iran’s nuclear program will be excluseleavy [sic] paceful [sic] and mark a fundamental shift in their approach to this issue.” (2015)

Pushing harder to push the Jews out of their own land by means of illegal settlements

Now the Obama administration seems to care even less about the Oslo Accords into which the Clinton administration pressured the tiny state of Israel, enabling a bunch of defeated terrorists to set up a “legal” anti-Semitic terror base within what should be Israel’s own sovereign territory: State Dept. Tells Israel to Leave Illegal Arab Settlement.

As Adolf Hitler stressed: “Menschenrecht bricht Staatsrecht” (“human rights trump state law”) – while it is “us” who define what is a “human right” and what is not, at least when it comes to the Jews of Israel (or, well, to the Serbs).

Martin Sherman on the folly of the “Iran deal”

Astonishingly, nearly all the decisions of the Joint Commission, tasked with overseeing/ administering the implementation of the deal, are to be made by consensus – which in effect gives Iran veto power over them. In the case of inspection access, it is sufficient for two of its eight members (say China and Russia) to abstain for Iran to block any decision it dislikes. Continue reading Martin Sherman on the folly of the “Iran deal”

Is Obama administration inviting foreign powers to join it in crushing US democracy and Israel’s resistance…

… against the construction of a “P5+1+Iran” (or maybe “better” E3/EU+3-or-how-the-hell-it’s-called-by-the-EU-tyrants”) “left-green world dictatorship”?

Obama Turns to U.N. to Outmaneuver Congress – Washington is working on a new Security Council resolution making the nuclear deal legally binding on the next president” (foreignpolicy.com).

Every day now it seems more and more likely that there will be much much weeping ahead.